Scalp Micropigmentation and Tricopigmentation Difference

You cannot imagine a day without your hair, right? The thought of hair loss can scare and make you extremely uncomfortable. Alopecia or baldness is common with age. While you might be wondering if a hair transplant is the right choice, it is nevertheless free from side effects and a long recovery period. Luckily, scalp micropigmentation and tricopigmentation are less invasive procedures that create lasting results.

SMP vs Tricopigmentation: Similar or Different

Scalp micropigmentation is touted to be a permanent solution for alopecia, hair loss, baldness, and hair thinning that hides patches of hair loss with SMP pigment. Each SMP session may take a couple of hours, and the client may need touch-ups to restore the look after a few years. What’s more, even though scalp micropigmentation is a permanent procedure, it can be removed. A scalp technician is trained to remove SMP with a laser treatment.

What is Tricopigmentation?

Tricopigmentation, on the other hand, is a temporary option for clients who have not made up their minds about a permanent solution. Since tricopigmentation is not a permanent solution, the pigment may fade naturally within a year or so. Removing the ink might not be as easy as the removal of SMP pigment. STP pigments can get extremely hot and burn the skin. SMP may be a better option for treating a large area of the scalp.

Scalp tricopigmentation is a solution to hair loss that restores hairline and disguises bald patches with tiny dots applied with a tattoo pen. Tricopigmentation is believed to conceal such conditions as Alopecia Universalis. The procedure gives hope to many people suffering from the embarrassment of a bald scalp.

Both procedures require the most skilled technician to do the job right. An inexperienced scalp artist might not be the best person for the job and might end up with a botched procedure.

What are the Differences

Although both procedures are similar, there are slight differences between them. SMP is a one-time procedure, which offers a permanent solution to the hair loss problem and may require touch-ups after a few years. On the other hand, tricopigmentation can last for a few months and the ink fades away. However, none of the two damages hair follicles.

Duration

Anybody interested in a trial of scalp pigmentation can choose tricopigmentation to see if it suits their looks and style. It may last only 6 – 12 months while scalp micropigmentation is more of a permanent procedure that requires retouching every 5 – 6 years.

Removal

SMP is easier to remove than a botched tricopigmentation procedure. A technician uses a laser to remove scalp micropigmentation, the removal of tricopigmentation might not be as simple. Rather, you may have to wait for the ink to naturally fade away after a few months.

Cost

As far as the cost of tricopigmentation vs. SMP is concerned, the former is cheaper since it is temporary. But if you consider the long-term efficacy of a procedure, SMP might look more expensive but it is cheaper to maintain and has long-lasting results.

Which is Better: Scalp Micropigmentation vs Tricopigmentation

SMP is easier to maintain as it requires touchups only after a few years as opposed to tricopigmentation that may need a retouch every year. That could raise the cost of the procedure.

SMP is cheaper and easier to maintain. If you do not want to go under the knife, scalp micropigmentation and tricopigmentation are hair restoration alternatives. It’s your choice which way you want to go. All in all, SMP gets an upper hand over tricopigmentation.